1.0Pravni Zapisihttps://www.pravnizapisi.rs/en/Dusan Savichttps://www.pravnizapisi.rs/en/author/dusan/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="JeK8m7LIh8"><a href="https://www.pravnizapisi.rs/en/issues/1-2010/7094-2/"></a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.pravnizapisi.rs/en/issues/1-2010/7094-2/embed/#?secret=JeK8m7LIh8" width="600" height="338" title="“” — Pravni Zapisi" data-secret="JeK8m7LIh8" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://www.pravnizapisi.rs/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js /* ]]> */ </script> PRAVNI ZAPISI • Year I • no. 1 • pp. 38–73 CHARACTERISING THE DAYTON CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL – ON AN UNSUCCESSFUL CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERIMENT Dr. iur. habil Edin ŠarčevićVanredni profesor, Pravni fakultet u Lajpcigue-mail: edin@uni-leipzig.de . . Pravni zapisi, no. 1/2010, pp. 38-73 Original Scientific Article DOI: 10.5937/pravzap1001038Q KEYWORDSFramework Agreement for Peace, Annex 4, Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, constitution contracting, constituent people, constitutional antinomies, ethnocracy, human rights, state of emergency, European Convention on Human Rights, segregation, discrimination on the grounds of ethnicity, constitutional amendments, federal state, rule of law, sovereignty, justice, procedural legitimacy. ABSTRACTThe Bosnian-Herzegovinian constitutional system emerged as a specific […]https://pravnizapisi.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PngItem_278380-150x150.jpg